>One of the coolest FoxPro apps I ever shipped worked on 2 Gb 10"
>tablet-network hybrids with 32Gb SSD storage. Taken into the field for data
>gathering and docked in the home office to upload data to the mothership
>and gather tomorrow's assignments. If they dropped one out of their truck
>onto the driveway, we had to spend another $129 to replace it.
Hm.. tablets. I don't know if this is applicable to your case, but MS
is permitting vendors to ship devices with 32 GB SSD HDDs and
full-blown Windows 10 on them. First time somebody is confronted with
an MS forced "upgrade", the thing tanks, because there isn't enough
extra space to handle the downloading/unpacking etc etc. After many
weeks of struggling, the intrepid Susan Bradley (the "Patch Lady" for
those who know her) finally figured out how to get an upgrade
installed by plugging in a USB drive for extra storage and fiddling
around with it (I can't remember the details but she may actually
have had to temporarily merge the USB with the SSD as one logical
partition; not something your typical user is gonna do). As she said,
it shouldn't be that hard, and MS never should have permitted those
vendors to ship those machines.
> > Windows 10 now requires 32 GB of space for itself (build "1903").
> > That means you need 64 GB in order to cope with the
> > download/installation/cleanup process for those eventual feature
> > "upgrades" that we, as mere pawns in MS's marketing game, are no
> > longer allowed to ignore. And some people have been speculating that
> > the OS space is likely to double to 64 GB in the near future. That
> > would mean a 128 GB HDD would have no room left at all for anything else.
> >
>
>128 Gb (billions of bytes! sheesh!) was a minimum, absolutely. You spec'ced
>machines without customizing. More is better, nearly always.
Well, a 256 GB SSD HDD seems to be one of the most common
configurations in off-the-shelf laptops these days.
> > So modernity expects a person like me to be happy with 256 GB. But
> > I've always been a fan of over-provisioning because the unpredictable
> > and the unexpected is an everyday thing in my life.
> >
>
>Sure. Are these field machines you expect to be beaten to death in a couple
>of years or long-term cubicle machines as investments you plan to keep
>alive for 4-5 year? And what do you run on them? That would guide you to
>pick between workaday Inspirons vs. high-performance Lattitudes for
>example, sticking with Dell as a f'rinstance.
We've been able to get 5-7 years out of most of our ASUS and Acer
machines up to now. I have one guy who, though he never leaves his
office, insists on using a laptop instead of a desktop because he
refuses to allocate more space. He's had three hard drives fail on
three laptops over the last 9 years. But he also periodically throws
tantrums at equipment and has been known to physically break pretty
good-quality scanners and even big ol' copiers. So who knows? Maybe
he picks up the laptop and flings it at the wall on occasion.
We have around 40 laptops (and around 100 desktops). Somewhere
between 15 and 20 of the laptops travel constantly; the rest are at
the main office and used occasionally for presentations, or by
traveling staff who come into the office to do "paper" work on them
on a regular basis.
I had one of the traveling laptops die due to a controller failure a
couple of years ago. But that's about it. We replaced a bunch of them
with newer models about the same time as that one, not because there
was anything wrong with them, but because New York State, in its
infinite wisdom, gave us a bunch of money and told us we had to buy
new laptops for that particular contract. Which was good because the
old ones were i3 and dog slow for anything other than web browsing,
and we replaced them with i7s.
Some of these older more-or-less stationary i3 laptops are also
dog-slow running my agency-wide Foxpro app. Travelers who need to use
that app get to it via RDP, where it is actually quite snappy,
because it lives in a VM on a massively-overprovisioned
hypervisor/SAN cluster. We'll see if that continues to be the case
after we put a VPN on the RDP channel (another one of those fun NYS
requirements).
As for HDD size (as Arlo Guthrie might say, "Remember HDD size? It's
a song about HDD size.") although some of these travelers are
fervently believed by the state Health Department not to need to
store any highly sensitive PII or PHI on the machines, in fact they
do it all the time; hundreds of downloaded partially-completed PDF
insurance forms. And we have nurses who do field assessments using an
offline system that stores a lot of local data until they can get
internet access and synch it with a website. And people in general
are packrats. I can tell them to delete stuff they don't need until
I'm blue in the face, to little or no effect. I'd rather let them
accumulate in peace than have them constantly pester my help desk
guys with complaints about running out of room.
And my policy is that, regardless of the original purpose for which
they are purchased, the devices should all be interchangeable so they
can easily be reassigned. So if only a few of them need an i7 and 512
GB of HDD space right now, then they all should have that to meet
potential future needs.
Thanks.
Ken