Ken - when you mentioned the "other thread" - I thought you were
referring to MY recent thread. But, upon filtering - I didn't see a
reply from you on that thread. However, I just searched your name in my
inbox & found the BitDefender thread. I didn't read that particular
thread - since I had never heard of that app before. So - I'm going to
read thru that thread now. Funny - since we currently have 3 recent
threads all discussing about the same topic.
-K-
On 12/8/2017 11:27 AM, Ken Dibble wrote:
>
>> However, even third party SW can have flaws in its SW! Right?
>
> As I said in the other thread on this topic: Experts recommend that
> people should not rely on a single product, no matter who makes it,
> for anti-malware protection. Every product behaves differently and
> catches some threats while missing others. My statement in this thread
> was what I tell people when they ask me if they should just rely on
> Windows Defender.
>
> Note that I also said in the other thread that you should have
> multiple products installed and use them for manual scans. You should
> only have ONE *real-time scanner* running at any given time.
>
> Ken
>
>> And - since this thread is bringing up issues w/Malware protection -
>> and I had started another thread about malware - maybe its a good
>> time to ask. What DO People use to protect against Malware? And, is
>> MalWareBytes the best protection against MalWare??
>>
>> -K-
>>
>>
>> On 12/8/2017 10:07 AM, Ken Dibble wrote:
>>> Meanwhile, other links say this is an issue with the Windows
>>> "Malware Protection Engine"--Windows Defender.
>>>
>>> The reason why Windows Defender isn't good enough is because it is
>>> manufactured by the same company that makes the OSes that it's
>>> supposed to protect. It is likely dependent on code in those OSes,
>>> and if there are flaws in that code, then there will be flaws in
>>> Windows Defender.
>>>
>>> That is the explanation I give people when I am asked if they should
>>> rely on Windows Defender instead of using third-party malware
>>> protection.
>>>
>>> Now I have actual data to back me up.
>>
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]