Per Dave's suggestion, I am just now taking the opportunity to try out the file transfer in SplashDesktop again. It does indeed appear that the major bug where folders were not being fully populated is gone. Sadly, performance is probably about as slow as copying via RDP. I'm transferring 387 files from my system to the remote and it's about a third of the way through after several minutes. Conversely, I was grabbing a bunch of files (1000s) from a different client site using LMI earlier today and it completed in less time. If file transfer is an important part of your remote access needs, SplashDesktop isn't even playing in the same league.
--
rk
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html ---
Richard, Must admit that I only normally use it for limited file transfer so performance hasn't been a consideration. I did however contact Splashtop about the slowness and they have reported that a major performance increase will be shipped out very early in the new year.
Dave
-----Original Message----- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kaye Sent: 08 December 2016 21:26 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: [NF ] SplashDesktop followup
Per Dave's suggestion, I am just now taking the opportunity to try out the file transfer in SplashDesktop again. It does indeed appear that the major bug where folders were not being fully populated is gone. Sadly, performance is probably about as slow as copying via RDP. I'm transferring 387 files from my system to the remote and it's about a third of the way through after several minutes. Conversely, I was grabbing a bunch of files (1000s) from a different client site using LMI earlier today and it completed in less time. If file transfer is an important part of your remote access needs, SplashDesktop isn't even playing in the same league.
--
rk
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html ---
[excessive quoting removed by server]