I didn't test it and didn't use it in many years, but could be possible that the table had a file lock (not record lock) by this another user?
Don't know if the message is the same or something more like "table header is locked by another user"
El vie., 16 mar. 2018 4:30, mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com escribió:
On 2018-03-15 21:15, Richard Kaye wrote:
INSERT INTO has to be doing an implicit USE, don't you think?
I can't tell if the table was open, and if not, your logic is reasonable, but if it WAS already open, ????
[excessive quoting removed by server]