Mike,
I have been using Armadillo aka Software Passport for years. I do not know of any protection issues but my distribution to clients is limited - in the couple dozen range.
When I bought, it was purchased as 32 or 64 bit. That depended on the source machine, not the target.
Carl
-----Original Message----- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com Sent: 12/01/2016 10:59 AM To: ProFox Subject: PROTECTING YOUR DISTRIBUTED CODE (was Re: Using a common class from another EXE/DLL)
On 2016-12-01 06:27, Ted Roche wrote:
Agree. Depends on the level of security you want/need. Compiling encrypted is enough to deter most. Nearly all Fox EXE / DLL can be decrypted, so if you *really* need it secure, look to a 3rd party solution, or move the secure parts off the client's machine and require them to contact a web resource you control so they can't access it.
I recall somebody mentioning Armadillo to protect your EXEs in the past (from reverse engineering): http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Programming/Registration_Tools/The_Armadi llo_Software_Protection_System.html
ReFox also offers protection: http://www.refox.net/-overview.html
Can you think of any other tool preferable to use for protecting your deployed apps?
Any comments on the two mentioned above?
tia, --Mike
[excessive quoting removed by server]