It's nothing to do with not being able to do it, it's because there is no real gain from doing it. Of course they could build a 64 bit IDE if they wanted.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018, at 12:12 AM, Fletcher Johnson wrote:
> Or you might ask them why Visual Studio is only a 32 bit application....
> Yes, it can build 64 bit apps, but they can't figure out how to compile it
> as a working 64 bit app. And if they can't fix that in all the time they
> have had, how would you expect them to redo windows????
>
> Maybe they are hoping we will all move to Linux and run our apps on Azure
> instead.... Much less work for them to support... All I know is that they
> are doing their best to piss off everyone they can.
>
>
> Fletcher Johnson
> FletcherSJohnson@Yahoo.com
> LinkedIn.com/in/FletcherJohnson
> beknown.com/FletcherJohnson
> twitter.com/fletcherJ
> twitter.com/svcsug
> strava.com/athletes/fletcherjohnson
> 408-946-0960 - work
> 408-781-2345 - cell
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 7:34 AM
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [NF] Broken Windows
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:28 AM Man-wai Chang
changmw@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
> > Which means Micro$oft might need to rewrite it again? ;)
> >
> >
> Well, they bought DOS, slapped a gui on it, sold that for nearly 20 years,
> moving it from 16- to 32-bit, yay Win32s!
>
> Windows, 2.0, 3.1, 3.1, 3.11, W4Workgroups, W4Tablets, w4Work, Win95, 98,
> Millenium
>
> They teamed up with IBM to write OS/2 later "WARP," using Windows New
> Technology with the New Technology File System.
>
> Then they torpedoed IBM and released it as Windows NT. And that's what we
> are running today, Windows NT 3, 3.5, 3.51, 4, 7, Windows Vista, Windows 8,
> Windows 10. They've glommed a lot of stuff on top, but it's Windows NT on
> NTFS with its lousy security model, patched over with a new domain model
> and Policy enforcement, but it's the Registry and LAN Man and the same old
> print queue.
>
> It's tens of millions of lines of code, written mostly by people who don't
> work there any more. It's huge, it's heavy, it's buggy. And it runs on
> Desktops. And Servers. And not much else. Not smartphones, not lightweight
> tables, not the internet. Ignoring Windows CE (which still exists, running
> my settop box -*shudder), WindowsPhone, and XBox OS, all speciality
> spinoffs.
>
> Perhaps they should rewrite it. Third time's the charm, or so they
> mythology goes within MS.
>
> Highly recommended:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows for a
> refresher on the history. Good overview.
>
> --
> Ted Roche
> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
>
http://www.tedroche.com
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]