Re: Variable/Procedure Naming Conventions

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Paul H. Tarver paul@tpcqpc.com wrote:

saying that with today's strongly typed variables, notation like this is useless and should be avoided.

Quite frankly, it hacked me off

I completely agree *if you are using a strongly-typed language* that including the type-prefix in the variable/field names is redundant. VFP is NOT strongly typed, so sometimes it's handy.

Any standard, even an arbitrary one, is better than a system that mixes Hungarian with camelCase with the next cool naming scheme.