On Tue, 13 Aug 2024, at 2:37 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
I've always suspected that Microsoft adopted this approach not because it was useful to users, but because it bloated the storage requirements for a business running Exchange, forcing companies to pay lots more money for storage.
I certainly fail to see who is benefiting from the new Outlook (i.e. the web application in a container) other than the Azure division's bean counters. Fine, as a replacement for the default simple Windows mail application - but as a replacement for the full fat desktop client, I just don't get it.