I've had good luck with the RV042G router/firewall, part of the Cisco Small Business line of routers. I have one location with 60 systems routed through a single RV042G without any hiccups or complaints. The RV042G is getting long in the tooth though, and I would love to find a sub-$200 router/firewall that would handle the work. Maybe the Cisco RV320K9?
I've also used one of the TPLink boxes and had issues getting a box that worked. The other problem is that it seems like every router/firewall has WIFI built in whether you want it or not, you pay for it. I've already got WIFI taken care of, thanks very much!
I've purchased and attempted to configure a Ubiquiti EdgeRouter, which gets rave reviews, is exceptionally low priced, but WOW what a pain to configure! But from what I can tell, the Ubiquiti product line is worth some effort and I do hope they'll improve their UI for the configuration. If anyone else has experience with a Ubiquiti router, I'd love to chat!
Mike Copeland
Ken Dibble wrote:
Which software router are you looking at? Coyote? Most of the software routers I have used are no longer being supported or developed.
Nothing has been recommended by our consultants yet. I'm trying to prepare in advance.
The choices in hardware router/firewall devices are not that great. I've been using a Zyxel 1000G for a few years and it has been, mostly, reliable. I've had it get wonky and require a reboot twice in 6 years. The interface is very very different...completely object-oriented. Fortunately Zyxel provides excellent tech support, they'll even log in to your router and configure it for you if needed.
The CISCO was rock solid for quite a while. However, a couple years ago its memory failed and was replaced with a used substitute. Since then we've had to cycle the power on it about once every 2-3 months to restore connectivity.
Its web interface is horrendously byzantine in terms of its "security" features, which did not behave well in IE, and even worse in Firefox. It could take 10-15 minutes of going through various windows and resubmitting credentials before it would give up the goods and show me something.
I don't think you'll run into any throughput issues with your load on any device, or software-based system.
That's good to know.
Thanks very much, Mike.
Ken
Ken Dibble wrote:
Hi folks,
Looks like our "ancient" (2008) CISCO router has died.
I would appreciate the benefit of your experience regarding hardware vs software routers/firewalls to help me evaluate replacement options.
Our current network uses 1 GB switches and has about 150 machines, and there can be at least that many people simultaneously using the network and our 25 mbps synchronous internet connection (including people hooking into our internet from smart phones and tablets). Most servers, including the domain controller, are virtualized and we are using a SAN for storage (two identical Synology Linux NAS devices). We have a 10 GB switch for virtual server/storage connectivity.
We do not host external (internet) email or websites on our network.
We've had slow growth in the number of machines and users (+/- 5% per year) over the past decade.
We've always used the NAT functionality of the CISCO to provide a firewall and we only rarely allow anything to punch through it. The main exception would be our RDP server, which is in frequent use by between 5 and 10 simultaneous connections.
My understanding is that a software router/firewall running on an ordinary PC is likely to be slower than a dedicated hardware device. However, is the difference so significant for a network like mine as to rule out a cheaper software solution?
Do you have preferences for specific devices or software packages?
What do you all think?
Many thanks.
Ken Dibble www.stic-cil.org
[excessive quoting removed by server]