Pete - FYI - I DID see your reply last night - the original one. But, I saw that in my personal home email. Here at work today - will admit I did NOT see that reply. So - who knows - maybe you mistakenly ONLY wrote your reply to me instead of to the list. And, I actually just now checked on my Cell Ph - and that is truly the case - your original reply you ONLY sent to me.
As for your actual comment - maybe anything you said in the Past was always OT - but, this time around - you properly stuck to the topic! Good job!!! :-)
Regards, Kurt Wendt Senior Systems Analyst
Tel. +1-212-747-9100 www.GlobeTax.com
-----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 6:56 AM To: profoxtech@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] Do you prefer Digest Mode?
Well, I replied to this 8 hours ago, but my reply didn't make it.
I said that "anything I say is considered [OT]". I didn't think that was offensive but . . .
Maybe the list has a filter that stops anything with [OT] in the body text, or something. It ain't easy being green . . .
On 06/12/2017 08:53 PM, Kurt at VR-FX wrote:
Wow - seems we are ALL in a Agreement!
Hey Pete - what do YOU think??
:-) -K-
On 6/12/2017 8:46 PM, Vince Teachout wrote:
Ugh. No Digest Mode for me, thanks.
[excessive quoting removed by server]