fact is, people are lousy drivers, and imperfect >automation is already better.
I keep hearing this but based on what evidence? It might do OK on wide
motorways\freeways\autobahns but take it somewhere like the centre of
Milan at rush hour.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
On Sat, 11 Nov 2017, at 11:49 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Alan Bourke
alanpbourke@fastmail.fm
> wrote:
> >
> > I doubt we'll see widespread adoption of fully autonomous road vehicles
> > in any of our lifetimes.
>
> I doubt the automobile will replace the horse. People want to feel in
> charge, go where they want to go, and cars are so unreliable, breaking
> down all the time.
>
> > Even if the tech problems were solved, which
> > they are far from being despite the hype, I'm still unclear as to what
> > problem it would solve. Road deaths? I suspect putting the money into
> > driver education and enforcement would yield better returns.
>
> Despite pouring millions into education, insurance programs, safety
> devices from seatbelts to airbags, deaths per million miles went UP
> last year. In the US alone, 40 THOUSAND people died on the roads. The
> fact is, people are lousy drivers, and imperfect automation is already
> better, but the numbers.
>
> > About the only sensible application I can see is for disabled people.
>
> The only thing is, we're all disabled.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]