3 Nov
2016
3 Nov
'16
3:16 p.m.
When I am called in to audit/rescue a project, one of the items on my checklist is to attempt to recreate the project by adding the main program to a new PJX and Build All. Nearly every project I have ever worked on failed this step because it missed an EXTERNAL PROCEDURE call or a programmatically-created resource within the project.
It is an excellent exercise to confirm your project CAN be rebuilt, but it's not a good way to rename a project.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:24 AM, mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
If you wanted to rename a project, would you create a new PJX with the right/desired name, or would you just rename the existing PJX/PJT? Just curious.
[excessive quoting removed by server]