At 06:40 2016-02-23, Ken Dibble krdibble@stny.rr.com wrote:
There are no technical reasons why I shouldn't
have been allowed to continue to run Office 97 on Windows 7
Endless backward compatibility is unrealistic and there is a point where providing some aspect of it costs a company more than it's worth in user retention. Should Microsoft or anyone else really have to deal with all the heartache of enabling and supporting 16-bit software on a 64-bit OS at this point in time, especially when there are solutions like virtualisation and containers? Windows does a better job than almost anything bar certain big-iron mainframe operating systems in this respect.