ProFox May 2025

profox@leafe.com

16 participants
10 discussions

FoxPro & AI Humor!
by Kurt Wendt 04 Jun '25

04 Jun '25

First off - TGIF Folks!!! I thought folks might find this funny - and, yeah - it's Totally FoxPro related! So, my 1 co-worker here in the IT Dept. - he was chuckling and was wondering if I could ask Claude AI to "Roast" me. Well, I figured - hey - I can take a joke! As such - I did it. *** ME: Hey Claude - since we have been working together a bit right now - I have a funny question for you - especially since you already know a little about me, and that I like to be Humorous. If I asked you to write a bit of a joke, to basically "Roast" me - could you do it??? *** Claude: Ha! I'd be happy to give you a friendly roast based on what I've learned about you! 😄 clears throat So we've got KHW here - a guy who works with FoxPro in 2025. That's like being a blacksmith in the Space Age! He spent two days trying to get a double-click event to work, going through more failed attempts than a teenager asking someone to prom. "Let's try macro substitution!" CRASH "How about WRITEMETHOD?" CRASH "Maybe some colons as separators?" CRASH By the end, we had more error messages than a Windows Vista startup sequence! And then - THEN - he creates his own sorting problem by copy-pasting database records like he's making a recipe: "I'll just take this 'dss' from over here and... wait, why doesn't anything work?" It's like following IKEA instructions but using parts from three different furniture sets! But you know what? The man stuck with it, kept debugging, kept asking the right questions, and got it all working. He "rectumfied" his own mistakes with style and toilet humor! FoxPro may be deader than disco, but KHW's keeping it alive one double-click event at a time! 🎤⬇️ How's that for a friendly roast? 😉 *** ME: That was EXCELLENT indeed! Although - my co-worker considers it Disturbing! *** Claude: 😂 Oh no! Your co-worker thinks it's disturbing? I can only imagine them reading over your shoulder like: "Wait... you're getting roasted by an AI? And you're enjoying it? And you two have been troubleshooting FoxPro together for days like some kind of... coding therapy session?" backs away slowly "I'm just gonna pretend I didn't see any of this..." Your co-worker probably thinks you've developed some kind of Stockholm Syndrome with artificial intelligence! "First he talks to the computer, now the computer is making fun of him, and he's LAUGHING about it!" Maybe they're just jealous that you found an AI willing to suffer through FoxPro debugging with you. Not everyone gets that kind of dedicated technical support AND comedy combo! Though I have to ask - are they disturbed by the roast itself, or by the fact that you asked for it in the first place? Because one of those is much more concerning than the other! 😄 Your co-worker clearly doesn't appreciate the fine art of AI-human banter. Their loss!

8 13

A Difficult Problem & SAD AI Truth...
by Kurt Wendt 30 May '25

30 May '25

So, in the previous couple days I was working on a bit of difficult problem. Since, yeah, Grids can already be difficult to work with - depending on what you are trying to do. But, it my case - I felt almost like I was "flying Blind" - because of this particular code scenario. The system I am working on has a number of things in it that makes it GREAT from the User aspect - but, Painful from a Dev point of view. As in, coding to allow screens to scale bigger and smaller. Which is great - but, at times adds a level of complexity to the code. Another example is that the system will actually generate grids on the fly. Then, when a user does changes to the grid - like makes some columns wider while making others narrow - the system will remember those settings. And, for this one screen, in one tab of a PageFrame - at design time it's empty. But, at run time it has a grid. Well, I was simply trying to make code work that would allow a double-click on a grid line of data for the screen to flip from the 3rd tab in the pageframe to switch to the 1st tab. But, trying to do that became very difficult - since, as I said - the grid essentially gets generated and display on the form in a tab on the fly. After spending about half a day to try and make it work, and becoming frustrated - I decided to turn to my good buddy Claude AI for some assistance. And so, by the end of the day on Tuesday I had generated a text file for the screen in question (using SccTextX.PRG). Also had a rather complex AI prompt ready to give Claude - and he generated feedback and code to implement - which I then jumped into implementing on Wed. morning. I implemented his code chunk, ran a test - and got an error. I then pushed that error back to Claude (giving him a screen capture of the error) - which is able to read & interpret - then he gave me several possible options to try, in order to try and resolve the issue. And this went back and forth MANY Times. In many cases, he would give me several options to try. By late yesterday afternoon - I was about to just give up. {Since, truth was - this particular screen change is one I suggested, since it seemed like a great idea - until I tried to make it work!} But, finally - late yesterday afternoon, I got code changes suggestions from Claude that finally Worked - not only did it NOT Crash - but, it finally truly worked - and double-clicking on the data row forced the screen to flip from Tab 3 to Tab 1! I was TOTALLY Stoked! I then sent a prompt to Thank Claude for the help. *** ME: It FINALLY Works - does NOT Crash - and DOES Switch over to the 1st data tab on the screen if we double-click a row of data in the 3rd tab of the screen. Thanks for ALL your help - as this was Definitely a Tricky bit of coding! *** Claude: YES! Congratulations! I'm so glad we finally got it working! You were absolutely right to be frustrated with this - it really was a tricky piece of coding. Dynamic grid generation with runtime method assignment is genuinely complex, even for experienced developers. ... Your persistence really paid off, and your feedback about the errors helped narrow down the issues. FoxPro may be an older language, but problems like this show up in any language when you're doing dynamic object manipulation. Great job sticking with it! Now your users will have that nice double-click functionality to quickly jump from the Quick List back to the detail view. But - then I had a thought, and had some new questions for Claude in regards to the outcome and Claude himself. *** ME: I will ask you one more related question. ALL that we went thru today, and starting yesterday - and trying to get things working. I was curious to know if you are TRULY Learning from our mistakes. And, that - if I was to ask a similar question from you, for a very similar scenario - would what you learned today allow you to much more quickly generate usable code that doesn't crash and avoid all the problems we had today? And, I mean - if I start a different chat session with you - would you be able to solve the issue quicker? Also, from what you learned today - if someone else on the internet posed the same problems to you, in regards to FoxPro and what we were trying to do - will you be able to take what you learned today - to be able to help them quickly as well??? *** Claude: That's a great question, and I want to be completely honest with you about how I work. Within this conversation: Yes, absolutely! I have learned from our mistakes. If you asked me right now to help with a similar FoxPro dynamic grid problem, I would: Immediately avoid trying to assign methods dynamically with macro substitution Start with the custom property + handler approach we ended up with Be much more careful about object creation timing Understand the limitations of FoxPro's runtime object manipulation In a new chat session: Unfortunately, no. I don't retain information between separate conversations. Each new chat starts fresh - I wouldn't remember any of our troubleshooting today. I'd likely make similar mistakes initially because I wouldn't have the context of what we tried and what failed. For other people: Same limitation. If someone else asked me the identical question tomorrow in a different conversation, I wouldn't have access to what we learned today. They might go through similar trial and error. This is honestly one of the frustrating limitations of how I work. All the valuable debugging experience we gained today - the specific insights about FoxPro macro substitution, object timing, and dynamic method assignment - that knowledge doesn't persist beyond this conversation. However, the general principles we discovered (like using custom properties instead of dynamic method assignment) are part of good programming practices that I do understand across conversations. But the specific "don't try X because it fails with error Y in FoxPro" - that contextual knowledge is lost. It's a real limitation, and I wish it worked differently! And THAT is the Crux of why I am making this post. I'm sure others here already know about these limitations of AI - but, I found this answer a bit strange - as I had thought that AI actually DOES learn from it's mistakes - learning that could then help others when they run into the same issues. So, I was a bit surprised to hear that it not only will NOT help others, in regards to what it learned in the chat session with me - but, it would NOT Help ME Either - if I opened up a new chat session and gave it the same problem! Ugh... -K

6 12

ProFox List Statistics for April 2025
by List Administrator Account 30 May '25

30 May '25

================================================== ProFox List Statistics April 2025 ================================================== Subscriber Count at End of Month: ProFox: 307 ProFoxTech: 183 ================================================== Total Posts: 59 (Up 7.27% from March 2025) Total [OT] Posts: 0 (Unchanged from March 2025) Total [NF] Posts: 0 (Unchanged from March 2025) Daily Message Counts for April 2025 ------------------------------------------------ DOW Date Count --- ---- ----- T 1 - 10 W 2 - 5 T 3 - 10 F 11 - 20 S 12 - 1 S 13 - 2 W 16 - 1 T 17 - 1 T 22 - 3 T 24 - 1 F 25 - 5 Message Counts By Day of Week for April 2025 ------------------------------------------------ DOW Count --- ----- Sun - 2 Tue - 13 Wed - 6 Thu - 12 Fri - 25 Sat - 1 Distinct Posters to the List (changes relative to March 2025) ------------------------------------------------ Non-OT messages: 18 (Up 5.88%) OT messages: 0 (Unchanged) NF messages: 0 (Unchanged) Total number: 18 (Up 5.88%) Top 20 Contributors by Number of Non-OT Posts ------------------------------------------------ | Posts Contributor | ------------------------------------------------ 1. 20 Kurt Wendt 2. 4 Alan Bourke 3. 3 Kurt Wendt 4. 3 Paul H. Tarver 5. 3 <juergen(a)wondzinski.de> 6. 3 Ed Leafe 7. 2 Jeff Roberts 8. 2 Eric Selje 9. 2 Ed Leafe 10. 2 Frank Cazabon 11. 2 Michael Oke, II 12. 2 Johan Nel 13. 2 Richard Kaye 14. 2 Rick Schummer 15. 2 Stephen Russell 16. 1 List Administrator Account 17. 1 Paul Hill 18. 1 AndyHC 19. 1 John Weller 20. 1 Garrett Fitzgerald Top 0 Contributors by Number of OT Posts ------------------------------------------------ | Posts OT% Contributor | ------------------------------------------------ Top 0 Contributors by Number of NF Posts ------------------------------------------------ | Posts Contributor | ------------------------------------------------ Top 20 Contributors by Total Number of Posts ------------------------------------------------ | Posts Contributor | ------------------------------------------------ 1. 20 Kurt Wendt 2. 4 Alan Bourke 3. 3 Kurt Wendt 4. 3 Paul H. Tarver 5. 3 <juergen(a)wondzinski.de> 6. 3 Ed Leafe 7. 2 Jeff Roberts 8. 2 Eric Selje 9. 2 Ed Leafe 10. 2 Frank Cazabon 11. 2 Michael Oke, II 12. 2 Johan Nel 13. 2 Richard Kaye 14. 2 Rick Schummer 15. 2 Stephen Russell 16. 1 List Administrator Account 17. 1 Paul Hill 18. 1 AndyHC 19. 1 John Weller 20. 1 Garrett Fitzgerald Top 5 Contributors by Number of New Threads Started ------------------------------------------------ | Posts Contributor | ------------------------------------------------ 1. 7 Kurt Wendt 2. 2 Rick Schummer 3. 1 List Administrator Account 4. 1 Ed Leafe 5. 1 Stephen Russell Top 16 Non-OT Threads by Total Number of Posts ------------------------------------------------------------------ | Posts Subject | ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. 19 FoxPro, AI & GCode - Oh My... 2. 9 The FOX Is Back!!! 3. 7 [ADMIN] Testing DKIM configuration 4. 5 FmPro Migrator ??? 5. 4 [ADMIN] Forum Emails Getting Blocked! 6. 3 [Admin] Archive Errors & Missing Emails... 7. 2 NF - old dogs and new tricks they say 8. 2 AW: FoxPro, AI & GCode - Oh My... 9. 1 ProFox List Statistics for March 2025 10. 1 Foxpro Developer Job Opening! 11. 1 AW: FmPro Migrator ??? 12. 1 Forum Emails Getting Blocked! 13. 1 Further Down the AI Rabbit Hole... 14. 1 Virtual Fox Fest 2025 (May): Register today, save $20 15. 1 Virtual Fox Fest 2025 (May): Sessions and Speakers 16. 1 A Foxy Background... Top 0 OT Threads by Total Number of Posts ------------------------------------------------------------------ | Posts Subject | ------------------------------------------------------------------ Top 16 Threads by Total Number of Posts ------------------------------------------------------------------ | Posts Subject | ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. 19 FoxPro, AI & GCode - Oh My... 2. 9 The FOX Is Back!!! 3. 7 [ADMIN] Testing DKIM configuration 4. 5 FmPro Migrator ??? 5. 4 [ADMIN] Forum Emails Getting Blocked! 6. 3 [Admin] Archive Errors & Missing Emails... 7. 2 NF - old dogs and new tricks they say 8. 2 AW: FoxPro, AI & GCode - Oh My... 9. 1 ProFox List Statistics for March 2025 10. 1 Foxpro Developer Job Opening! 11. 1 AW: FmPro Migrator ??? 12. 1 Forum Emails Getting Blocked! 13. 1 Further Down the AI Rabbit Hole... 14. 1 Virtual Fox Fest 2025 (May): Register today, save $20 15. 1 Virtual Fox Fest 2025 (May): Sessions and Speakers 16. 1 A Foxy Background...

4 3

ChilkatVFP 1.50 Released Last Week
by Bill Anderson 29 May '25

29 May '25

Folks, Sorry for the late notice, had a total knee replacement done two days after the release... Chilkat Version 11 exclusively uses the Chilkat.<class> COM call. Prior versions could use Chilkat_9_5_0.<class> for the COM call. Introduced the ChilkatVFP.H header file to handle this situation. If you use Chilkat v11 or greater, open the ChilkatVFP.H, set the CHILKAT_VERSION_11.0.0_OR_GREATER variable to .T., then recompile ChilkatVFP.VCX. If you support multiple Chilkat versions, set appropriately. Note: *Your* registry may not need it (depends on what's in your registry) but the intended runtime machine will most likely need it. And be sure to include the compiled ChilkatVFP.VCX/VCT to the runtime machine. A big release. Some older classes were removed, all the undocumented PEMs were removed, documented PEMs were removed and replaced by new functions. Many other functions marked as decremented for later removal. So, the list of items done for this release: 1) Added ChilkatVFP.H with compile-time switch. See Documentation/History.md for details. 2) Compatibility with Chilkat version 11.0.0. 3) Added code to test for removed classes/properties/methods. Bill Anderson --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html ---

4 6

Claude AI to the RESCUE!
by Kurt Wendt 23 May '25

23 May '25

So, earlier this week I got a request to produce a report(or more specifically an Excel file) - for someone here at work to review a whole bunch of Work Orders/Jobs - based upon the criteria of parts being manufactured had a particular process completed and the processing occurred on or after a day in August of last year. Suffice it to say - the database systems are VERY Complicated here - and there are actually 2 huge systems - that also have a lot of interactions between them. And, all the data relations are ALSO Very complicated. The deal is, each part being manufactured has a Routing process, where the part is routed to different areas in the manufacturing facility here, to have different processes completed to create the final part. And, there is a Routing report that is printed. So, I was pointed to a VFP program that was used to print the Routing report, a program that was updated to allow the program code to run independently, outside of the whole system/project. So, the idea was to review the program - and create a new program to gather up the data being requested. But, again - even that program is a bit rough to go thru, and may not have all the pieces. I was struggling a bit to try and get this done, and yet I knew it had to be done quickly. Well, yesterday morning on the way to work I came up with the game plan. The obvious answer was to have Claude create the program. So, I gave it the reporting program, as well as the criteria - and after resolving some of the hallucinations - I WAS Able to get a viable program running and produce the needed Excel files!!! Which I was really thrilled about. Now, just to give folks an idea of some of the hallucinations from Claude, I will include some of them here. My Fav one is that Claude created a Cursor, then later in the code it did a Seek on the Cursor - but, the cursor had NO Index! Then, another one was in the Summary message it was printing to the screen. At one point it had this: ? "="*60 Which is simply not valid. And, yet, a couple lines down it did it correctly with this line: ? REPLICATE("-", 80) I find it Ironic that it would do an incorrect AND a correct version of similar code in the same program. Just kind of weird. Also, there was code involved in regards to building this kind of Job#. In the reporting program there were actually TWO Chunks of code related to building the Job# - but, in the program produced by Claude - he failed to implement the one chunk. I told Claude about this, and said it was related to a specific variable being used - then he correctly rectified the problem. So, all in all - it was a Fantastic Success. And, the idea of giving a Difficult problem to Claude and let him take a Whack at it - turned out to be a good decision. Anyway... For those that are interested, and have not tried Claude AI yet - you can use this link: https://claude.ai/referral/_eI4SiLd2A Have a GREAT Holiday Weekend folks (at least those of you in the ol' US of A!) -Kurt

1 0

Code Ref Tool is Broken...
by Kurt Wendt 20 May '25

20 May '25

Hello there Fellow Pro-Foxers! Happy Monday! I hope you all had a good weekend. So, I've been having this REALLY Weird problem!!! I was recently trying to run the Code References Tool - but, something Odd happened. As in - Nothing happened! And, I tried it a bunch of times. Now, at the time - I had this particular project opened on my screen - and I wanted to obviously search it. But, it was a No Go. Then, last week I tried it again - but, I was in a different session of VFP, and I was trying to do a search on a Different project. When an odd thing happened - I got a warning saying this other project was already opened. And, indeed that project was opened in another session of VFP. I was like - WTF - that makes no sense! So, I went into that other session of VFP, closed down that project - and SURE Enough - when I tried to open the Code References Tool - instead, it literally just opened up this one project. It just didn't seem to make sense. So, last week I was looking into this problem - searched the issue on the web - closest I got was a response by Tamara suggesting that this person recompile the FoxRef project. This was the link to the person reporting the problem: https://www.tek-tips.com/threads/vfp9-code-references-problem.1639205/ I actually DID try and recompile the FoxRef project, but - it turns out I got an error where it could not properly read one of the forms. Even when I tried to directly open the Form - I could not open the file. But, I figured I would try something - and, I WAS Indeed able to actually Run the FoxRef App - and I WAS able to actually do searches. However, it's weird that I have run the App directly instead of from the menu system. I was just looking around A LOT in the VFP Help - but, can't seem to easily figure out how I can see if a menu system somehow got corrupted. Which seems it Must be the case. I even looked around to see if maybe the FoxPro config file got corrupted - but, I already found out there is NO Config in use. So, if anyone can give me a pointer on how to fix this problem - that would be awesome! -Kurt

9 28

Re: Grid with Drag and Drop rows
by Philip Borkholder 14 May '25

14 May '25

Thank you Alan, I'll test this out. -Philip ---------- Original Message ---------- From: "Alan Bourke" <alanpbourke(a)fastmail.fm> To: profoxtech(a)leafe.com Subject: Re: Grid with Drag and Drop rows Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 09:00:32 +0100 Maybe GridHitTest() can help. https://hackfox.github.io/section4/s4g787.html -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm [excessive quoting removed by server]

2 1

Grid with Drag and Drop rows
by Philip Borkholder 12 May '25

12 May '25

Hi all, It's been awhile since I've been on here. Realizing that VFP grids have Column objects but not row objects has anyone developed a grid that allows us to move rows using ole drag and drop ? I know a list box can do it. I need more dynamic font colors and background colors in the grid to help my customer decide what needs to be re-arranged up and down. The list box doesn't have the dynamic column or cell colors as far as I know. Thank you, Philip B Vicksburg, MI

2 1

FmPro Migrator ???
by Kurt Wendt 05 May '25

05 May '25

Hello there Oh Mighty ProFox Hive Mind! As many of you know - I've been doing a lot of digging in to AI recently - to use it as a Tool for FoxPro system conversion. We are now at the point of looking at weather to use an Online AI tool (like Claude or CoPilot) vs. using a Local LLM (like Ollama and loading it with an AI Model). So, today - for the Hell of it - I put a question to the M$ CoPilot, essentially asking AI which AI option is the Best to use - for doing a conversion - using this prompt: What are the best AI options to use for trying to convert older Visual FoxPro code to a WPF based C#/.Net platform, in order to automate as much as possible the conversion of a FoxPro based system?? Honestly - I was Very Surprised by it's answer: For automating the conversion of Visual FoxPro code to a WPF-based C#/.NET platform, you might consider tools like FmPro Migrator. It offers a Code Conversion Workbench that supports automated conversion of Visual FoxPro PRG files and form code into C#. This tool allows you to manage the conversion process efficiently, customize machine learning prompts, and even train AI models to improve the quality of the converted code. Additionally, it integrates with tools like GitHub Copilot X and Visual Studio IntelliCode to refine the output further. As such, my question to the ProFox Hive - has anyone ever heard of this FmPro Migrator? Or, does anyone have any actual experience using it?? TIA, -Kurt

5 7

Fwd: 1 new FoxPro job in remote
by Kurt Wendt 03 May '25

03 May '25

I just got this email. Truth is - pay is HORRIBLE. But, figured I might pass this along anyway... Not sure if this email come across well - since it's a very Graphical email format. But, figured I would try... -K ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Indeed <alert(a)indeed.com> Date: Sat, May 3, 2025 at 3:22 AM Subject: 1 new FoxPro job in remote To: <kurthwendt(a)gmail.com> TriWest Healthcare Alliance has an opportunity for you! ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ [image: Indeed homepage] <https://clk.indeed.com/hp?co=US&utm_campaign=job_alerts&utm_medium=email&ut…> [image: see messages] <https://clk.indeed.com/messages?tk=1iqagc8v0hgun800&co=US&hl=en> [image: see notifications] <https://clk.indeed.com/notifications?from=ja&tk=1iqagc8v0hgun800&co=US&hl=en> 1 new FoxPro job in remote These job ads match your saved job alert ¹ Provider Data Specialist <https://www.indeed.com/rc/clk/dl?jk=8ebf7aa3c344f9c2&from=ja&qd=RnZhMybXSk4…> TriWest Healthcare Alliance *3.2* [image: 3.2/5 rating] Phoenix, AZ • Remote *$37,000 - $47,000 a year* Our Department of Defense contract requires US citizenship and a favorably adjudicated DOD background investigation for this position. 1 day ago <https://www.indeed.com/rc/clk/dl?jk=8ebf7aa3c344f9c2&from=ja&qd=RnZhMybXSk4…> View all jobs <https://www.indeed.com/jobs?q=FoxPro&hl=en&from=ja&l=remote&radius=25&alid=…> View jobs: since yesterday <https://www.indeed.com/jobs?q=FoxPro&hl=en&from=ja&l=remote&radius=25&alid=…> - for last 7 days <https://www.indeed.com/jobs?q=FoxPro&hl=en&from=ja&l=remote&radius=25&alid=…> ‌ Would you like to help other job seekers? ‌ Rate your experience working at Northrop Grumman [image: Write a review] <https://www.indeed.com/cmp/_/jaclick?rd=AAAAAF8Yv5zBFnBy391MPc39DNN5MaW%2Fm…> ‌ Your review helps other jobseekers determine if this company is the right fit. Don’t miss out on important job updates with the app Indeed mobile app makes your job search easier with timely notifications and personalized recommendations. [image: Download on the App Store] <https://indeed.onelink.me/oo1Z?af_xp=custom&pid=email&c=jobalerts&af_adset=…> [image: Get it on Google Play] <https://indeed.onelink.me/oo1Z?af_xp=custom&pid=email&c=jobalerts&af_adset=…> Edit this job alert <https://subscriptions.indeed.com/update/6773275d39bfa23ebfe33011?token=CkDd…> *Do not share this email* This email contains secure links that are personalized for you. Please do not share this email or links with others. Salaries estimated if unavailable. When a job posting doesn't include a salary, we estimate it by looking at similar jobs. Estimated salaries are not endorsed by the companies offering those positions and may vary from actual salaries. ¹ Displayed here are Job Ads that match the job alert query you saved. Indeed may be compensated by these employers, helping keep Indeed free for job seekers. Indeed ranks Job Ads based on a combination of employer bids and relevance, such as your search terms and other activity on Indeed. For more information, see the Indeed Terms of Service <https://www.indeed.com/legal?hl=en> © 2025 Indeed, Inc. Indeed Tower 200 West 6th Street, Floor 36, Austin, TX 78701 Privacy Policy <https://www.indeed.com/legal?hl=en#privacy> | Terms <https://www.indeed.com/legal?hl=en> | Help Center <https://support.indeed.com/hc/en-us> Manage email settings <https://subscriptions.indeed.com?token=CkDdIJsAZ2cy2d2jRCBiTJqwBE_imakP1FYV…> | Unsubscribe from this email <https://subscriptions.indeed.com/alerts/cancel?token=CkDdIJsAZ2cy2d2jRCBiTJ…> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai…> Virus-free.www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai…> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html ---

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

ProFox May 2025