At 08:49 2016-07-18, Ted Roche <tedroche(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>Hey, spoiler alert!
>
>Guess you'll need to subscribe to Gene's newspapers to find the solution.
Or run my program.
>By inspection, I can come up with at least one date closer than that.
Go ahead.
>So, let's think about the *algorithm* to solve the problem in minimal
>time, rather than the answer.
What I asked about. It appears that my code, though it seems
somewhat ugly, is a pretty good solution, at least by LOC.
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko